The Federal R&D tax credit generally ranges from 8% to 10% of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs), depending on a few key factors. This includes the calculation method selected, how your R&D activities trend over time (the base period), and whether or not the taxpayer selects the 280c reduced credit.
The Regular Credit method establishes the R&D Tax Credit based on a company’s historical research spending, comparing current-year QREs to a base amount from specified prior years, depending upon company formation. This approach benefits companies with consistent R&D investments and strong documentation, as it leverages historical expenditures, often from 30+ years prior to determine eligibility. The Regular Method can result in a higher credit rate though, especially if QREs have been steady or declining in the current year. However, it requires more historical documentation, including detailed records of gross receipts and qualified research spending from very early on in the company's history, which can make it more complex to implement.
The Alternative Simplified Credit offers a streamlined approach, focusing on a company’s recent R&D activity rather than a multi-year historical base. It uses a more straightforward analysis, comparing the current year's spending to your average research spending from the prior three years. This often make it more accessible for businesses with growing R&D investments or those lacking detailed historical records. While ASC is more flexible, companies should always assess whether it provides the most advantageous benefit.
Companies with consistently high or increasing R&D spending can see stronger percentages under the ASC method. That’s because a growing investment means current-year costs are more likely to exceed the historical baseline, maximizing the portion eligible for credit. In contrast, if past R&D spending was low, inconsistent, or even nonexistent, your current expenses may not exceed the baseline by much (or at all), which can shrink your credit percentage. In such cases, the Regular Credit method may yield better results, but requires additional documentation and analysis to support historical calculations. States which have R&D credits often follow one of both of these methodologies as well, and can range from 5% to 20%+ in credits.
Mitch Feldman is a co-founder of FCA. He leads our R&D tax credit practice with deep legal expertise, ensuring compliance and maximized claims.
Houston, Texas, USA
Copyright © 2025 Federal Credit Advisors - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.